[ SECRET POST #4198 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4198 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #601.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

From what I've read, people take issue with the idea that someone looked at a (fictional) child and their immediate thought was "I want to sexualize them". They assume the actual aging up part is disingenuous, only done to avoid criticism and that they don't really mean it. I've also heard people make the argument that it's too closely related to the whole "countdown to 18" thing people do with underage celebrities.

[(Anonymous)]

From what I've read, people take issue with the idea that someone looked at a (fictional) child and their immediate thought was "I want to sexualize them".

The way I see it, ageing them up is the complete opposite. You do it so you're NOT sexualizing them as children. I mean, sure, there are definitely people out there who do sexualize fictional kids, but I'm pretty sure the majority are more like "This is a cool character, I want to write stories about them", and some of those stories just happen to include the character as an adult, in adult situations.