case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-07-08 02:37 pm

[ SECRET POST #4204 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4204 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #602.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
tabaqui: (Default)

[personal profile] tabaqui 2018-07-08 09:06 pm (UTC)(link)
....i'm confused?
From the picture, it seems there an actual bear so that is...actual bestiality?

(Anonymous) 2018-07-08 10:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I mean, when someone says "bestiality" I think of like, explicit sex with animals. Not fluffy cartoon comics about someone taking a bear to disneyland based on the author going ha ha, my husband is a lot like a bear!

Especially with the level of outrage there seems to be in the secret??
tabaqui: (Default)

[personal profile] tabaqui 2018-07-08 10:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, you know - animals.

But yeah, i don't care what cartoon people do, even if they're doing animals.

(Anonymous) 2018-07-08 10:26 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm right there with you, I don't care what happens in fiction, lol.

It's just, of all the fictional "bestiality" to get outraged over, this comic seems not even worthy of being called that. Is it even bestiality if it's basically PG-rated comedy?? I just expected worse!
tabaqui: (Default)

[personal profile] tabaqui 2018-07-08 10:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Frankly, from the secret, i had no clue *what* to expect. I only got a clue from the link in comments.

OP

(Anonymous) 2018-07-08 10:45 pm (UTC)(link)
This was a preexisting macro. http://knowyourmeme.com/photos/1135196-furry-scale

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2018-07-08 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
I know that, but the macro itself holds a base level of pearl clutching that is way over the top to respond to the cartoony comedy bear.

Which is why I expected much worse.