[ SECRET POST #4206 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4206 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 24 secrets from Secret Submission Post #602.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Is it still worth making the project if it can only be made with Scarlett Johansson?

I mean, I get the financial reasons, and why it's profitable for the investors if they have Scarlett Johansson in the movie. But I don't personally care much about the investors and their profits. And I don't think that their profits can be considered a real justification for making the movie a certain way. I understand that it was their reason for doing so; it's just not a reason that I care about, or think is adequate.

[(Anonymous)]

How do you suggest they fund the project?

[(Anonymous)]

Have your famous actor in a major role that is not that character.

[(Anonymous)]

If that's the only way of making the project, is it still worth making?

[(Anonymous)]

Yep, director and writer get to tell the story they want to tell.

[(Anonymous)]

Can you expand on what you mean by that? Not sure I understand what you're getting at, sorry.