case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-07-11 07:28 pm

[ SECRET POST #4207 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4207 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 17 secrets from Secret Submission Post #602.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Eating animals/rant/idk

(Anonymous) 2018-07-12 02:06 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, if the shelter DELIBERATELY MISLED you, and lied about the rooster's fate, that is shitty as hell. I agree, you should slather them with scathing reviews, do whatever you have to do to get the word out about this.

On one hand, I do think once you surrender ownership of an animal, you can't really have a say in what happens to them. And killing any pet for any reason is a reality in many shelters. But it sounds like they lied to OP about slaughtering the animal and about their intentions. And while I don't think we should rank some animals as more valuable than others, an animal that has been socialized as a pet does feel wrong to just randomly choose for a slaughter demonstration.