Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2018-07-11 07:28 pm
[ SECRET POST #4207 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4207 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 17 secrets from Secret Submission Post #602.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-12 03:11 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-12 03:48 am (UTC)(link)The political ideology absolutely does reflect that. Especially in the instance of the groups that explicitly identify themselves as Nazis and use Nazi iconography. Their political ideology of those people is Naziism. Their organization, you could say, is not officially Nazi. It is true that no contemporary Nazi, fascist, or white supremacist is formally connected to the original German NSDAP, which is the most specific definition possible of the word "Nazi". But it's a stupidly limited definition to insist on, especially if you're talking specifically about their ideology.
Calling them "Nazis" is completely reasonable in many cases. There are some cases where it's just straight-up inaccurate, yes. And yes, there's some value in delineating the exact definition of radical right-wing racist ideologies. If I could control what term people used, I think "fascist" would probably be a better term in most cases. But there are many cases where "Nazis" isn't objectively unreasonable, and the specific distinction that you are using to object to it just does not matter very much.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-12 08:56 am (UTC)(link)second of all no one in germany gives a ahit about your distinction we still call neo-nazis nazis because there is literally nothing wrong with calling a spade a spade nor is it worth "splitting hairs" about, you're just muddying the discussion about those dumbfucks
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-12 12:14 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-12 02:24 pm (UTC)(link)Naziism was a pan-German nationalist movement that was committed to a fairly broad vision of "Aryan" blood. If you're an American talking about "the future of the white Aryan race" and blood and loyalty and stuff like that, that fits pretty comfortably within Nazi ideology, even if it's not explicitly German. This just isn't a contradiction in the way that you think it is.
They are Neo-Nazis who probably don't know shit about World War I/II era Germany
well, they obviously know something about WWII era Germany
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-12 02:42 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-13 09:08 am (UTC)(link)