Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2018-07-24 06:45 pm
[ SECRET POST #4220 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4220 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #603.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-24 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Yes, tons of musicals are little more than vehicles for showcasing a famous songwriter's body of work. I just saw a review of Mamma Mia 2 that used the term "Jukebox Musical" to describe that. Singing in the Rain and American in Paris are two of the better examples. Some of the early talkie musicals didn't even have a plot, and just modeled themselves after theatrical revues. And then you have films like Stormy Weather where you have Cab Calloway and Fats Waller performances even though they do little more than introduce themselves to the heroine. The modern musical as a dramatic song sequence (Bernstein, Lerner-Lowe, Rogers-Hammerstein, Sondheim) started to take over about WWII, but the increase in quality meant that Hollywood wasn't producing quite as many as in the 30s.
Cats, at least, is a consistent song cycle that was intended for a single performance. Maybe they can get a good writer to tighten up the frame story a bit.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-25 12:39 am (UTC)(link)Cats has probably the least amount of plot out of all critically acclaimed and popular musicals out there.
no subject