[ SECRET POST #4246 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4246 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 27 secrets from Secret Submission Post #608.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Just because fandom has created some headcanon for a character, doesn't mean the creator wasted potential by not going with fandom portrayals.

[(Anonymous)]

That's true, but I can't help but feel that there was still wasted potential with Tonks - they didn't need to have her be a punk but they should have done something more.

If nothing else, it's bullshit that she died. Garbage-ass bullshit.

[(Anonymous)]

The secret doesn't suggest that all headcanons are better than canon, but there's a good argument for this one.

[(Anonymous)]

IA. Fandom clings to headcanons and refuses to acknowledge anything else could be good.

That being said, Tonks wasn't a great character, but that can be said about many HP characters. She isn't worse than others, imo, just an unimportant character who we never got to really know.

+1

[(Anonymous)]

this.

and obv op should enjoy the headcanons they enjoy, but "character is now a cursing, one-liner spouting badass cliché" isn't really the interpretation i'd go for if i wanted to make more use of tonks as a character.

Re: +1

[(Anonymous)]

But they should have gone for something