Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2018-08-19 04:22 pm
[ SECRET POST #4246 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4246 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 27 secrets from Secret Submission Post #608.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-08-20 02:11 am (UTC)(link)Some peripheral characters do have more potential than others, given but unexplored in canon.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-08-20 03:31 am (UTC)(link)But Rowling didn't, and that's not a waste. You can't focus on literally every character in a series enough to give them all super detailed stories or to explore any potential in everyone to its fullest in a satisfying manner, because unless there's a small number isolated somewhere, they all will add in more characters exponentially.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-08-20 06:34 am (UTC)(link)I actually didn't use the word waste anywhere in my comment, because I agree that it's kind of strong/implies a moral judgement that doesn't really make sense, of course no book series will contain all stories for all people. But I do think that what we have of Tonks canonically was a missed opportunity for some particular and interesting stories that would have enriched the whole, in a way that's qualitatively different from most minor characters.