[ SECRET POST #4253 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4253 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 41 secrets from Secret Submission Post #609.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Based on #8

[(Anonymous)]

Huh. I find it way harder to find and talk about content on sites like Tumblr, compared to sites dedicated to a particular fandom. People rarely tag consistently and it's hard to have a discussion through reblogs.
And God help me if I want to discuss a part of the media critically. Apparently people think tags should never have negative opinions in them, or if there are tags set aside for critical posts instead of mindless fangirling, I have no way to find them.

Re: Based on #8

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, this is kind of what I was getting at with the idea of being too able to share things - it becomes this endless morass where you end up seeing *everything* and it's impossible to be selective.

Re: Based on #8

[(Anonymous)]

So the usual conventions I’ve seen with tags are “fandom,” “fandom critical” and “anti fandom,” “character,” “character critical” and “anti character” and so on for pairings and stuff. So squeeing goes in character tags, criticism in criticism tags, and “fuck this, that, and the other thing” goes in anti tags. I’ve also occasionally seen “meta” tags used apoended to characters and fandoms. It’s not perfect, but eh.