[ SECRET POST #4265 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4265 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Battlestar Galactica]



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________























05. [SPOILERS for Elementary season 6]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Suspiria]



__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for Banana Fish]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for discussion of sexual assault]

























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #610.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Why have you been deadset against it? It makes sense to me if you don't ship it because of lack of chemistry/etc, whatever people see in a ship, but to go in thinking, "I don't want to see these people together ever," before experiencing the media makes no sense to me.

[silverr]

Not OP, but for it it's because portrayals of genuine male-female friendship without UST are fairly rare. I like seeing something new on screen.

[(Anonymous)]

Which is fair enough for this iteration, but OP said they're against Sherlock/John in general, not just in this specific instance.

[silverr]

Ah, sorry, you're right, I did miss that opening statement (though I don't ship canonical Holmes/Watson either :p). I paid more attention to the picture and the tag of the secret.

ETA: fwiw, I also like portrayals of m/m unshakeable friendship as well sometimes. IMO, relationships of mutual affection and respect aren't necessarily inferior or less intense than relationships with romantic or sexual elements.)

OP

[(Anonymous)]

Tastes differ. I like my Holmes and Watson to be platonic partners, not romantic partners. I enjoy seeing their business partnership built upon friendship rather than romance, and it doesn't matter who's playing those roles.

[(Anonymous)]

They might really like ace Holmes, as he appears to be so in the original stories. I was pretty deadset against it too, but I have (very rarely) run into a fic that makes it work for me.

[(Anonymous)]

I am 100% down with ace Holmes, because that interpretation fits the ACD version best, IMO. I guess I should clarify... I'm not sure that ACD Holmes was asexual, but it seemed to me like he preferred to live his life without the distraction of romance and marriage. In that time period, that pretty much cut back on your sex life unless you visited prostitutes or had a discreet affair with a married woman/widow, neither of which really seems in character.

[deird1]

Sure, but there’s two different things there. Elementary’s Sherlock is definitely not asexual - but you could certainly say he prefers to live his life without the distraction of romance and marriage. Is it the attitude you find important, or the lack of sex?

[(Anonymous)]

I don't ship Holmes/Watson in the ACD canon. In fact, I never shipped them in any form until Sherlock came along and that's the only time I've shipped them to-date. Still, given how different various adaptations and derivative works can be and how the characters and their relationship are not always portrayed the same way, I'm not going to maintain any kind of strict policy on it and I agree it's weird to do so. Still, I can understand how not shipping them in the original canon might make shipping other versions of them too much of a turn-off.