[ SECRET POST #4267 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4267 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 36 secrets from Secret Submission Post #611.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

well if your question was supposed to be "don't you THINK that should be a mitigating circumstance" then my answer is "haha i'm not touching that discussion with a 10ft pole"

[tabaqui]

Apparently, it is, since 2002.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13218719.2016.1187243

[(Anonymous)]

and yet people with intellectual disabilities have been executed because the measure for how disabled you have to be is up to the state

[tabaqui]

Yes, I am aware that they have been.
Apparently Texas and Georgia are still doing it with impunity, among six states that regularly carry out the death penalty.

[(Anonymous)]

then what is your point what are you trying to say???

[tabaqui]

...that intellectual disability is a mitigating factor. Which is what I started off saying. Whether that mitigation makes a difference or not in actual prosecution is a different discussion.

[(Anonymous)]

ahuh