[ SECRET POST #4267 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4267 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 36 secrets from Secret Submission Post #611.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I would imagine yes, to some extent, but I'm not sure how much of a difference it makes in practical terms. If the person has shown themselves to be a serious danger to others and there's no way to fix that, then keeping them away from the general population would be a necessary step, and thus "not guilty due to reason of insanity" doesn't mean they just walk free. That amounts to life in prison, or life in an institution, rather, which I guess may be nicer, but it still sounds like life in prison to me. Either way, the result is pretty much the same.

(My state hasn't had capital punishment for a bazillion years, so not getting sentenced to death due to mitigating circumstances is irrelevant around here.)

I think when victim's loved ones get angry over "not guilty due to reason of insanity" it's that trials don't just mete out punishments, but also determine fault in the eyes of the law, so it's like hearing "This guy murdered your son, but it's not his fault" and that can be pretty rough to hear, even though you know the guy is getting locked up anyway.

[tabaqui]

Apparently, in 2002 SCOTUS said that executing a person with an intellectual disability was unconstitutional. Seems it would also be unconstitutional to accuse them of murder if they don't understand the concept, but that doesn't seem to be part of it.

Texas and Georgia are still executing people with ID.

[philstar22]

The standard for "not guilty by reason of insanity" is incredibly high. It is very, very rarely won. It is only won in cases where the person really had no idea what they were doing, no grasp of reality whatsoever.