Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2018-09-10 06:37 pm
[ SECRET POST #4268 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4268 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #611.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-09-10 11:02 pm (UTC)(link)But like...Emma Watson is just the same issue-times infinity, especially given that she's not as good an actor as Stone. And just thinking of all the Drama she caused and all the changes she forced on Beauty and the Beast...and how self-righteous she was about how "progressive" she was being. Just...urgh...
I trust Greta Gerwig to make a faithful but nuanced and quietly feminist version anyway. I don't need Emma Watson bossing the director and cast and crew around to "make it more progressive" and then congratulating herself for taking yet another female character who was already a decent role model and "fixing her" (see also: Belle and Hermione).
Also, they'd been speculating that Emma Stone was gonna be Meg to Saorisie Ronan's Jo, which I had doubted but would've been here for. And I just KNOW Emma Watson's "gold star white girl feminism" isn't going to LET her play anyone except Jo. (Unless she really rewrites the script).
* Runs off to watch the 1995 version. And the Katharine Hepburn version. And read the book instead*