[ SECRET POST #4268 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4268 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #611.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: depopulation vs overpopulation

[(Anonymous)]

I think part of it is that a good economic situation is considered to be one where there's growth. If the population is declining, that limits growth. So, people who benefit from strong growth don't want that to change. Also, if the economy is assured not to grow, that may mean a lot of things about our economic, social, and political systems and that's a hard pill to swallow. It would be a lot of work, detrimental to anyone who benefits from the status quo (which isn't just people in power), and it would be very hard to sell to the public. Of course continued population growth is unsustainable, but dealing with the effects of a population plateau or decline is hard work ...for people who are not me 'cause I'm not in charge. :P

Re: depopulation vs overpopulation

[(Anonymous)]

I guess people don't like change.

I think it's about time people stop pretending the status quo is working. Or that endless growth is possible.