[ SECRET POST #4270 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4270 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #611.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Inspired by the not-fandom failbarred secret - internet panhandling

[(Anonymous)]

" I assume that in order to get those posts spread, you need friends who trust you..."

I think you're giving way too much credit. It's too easy to reblog things without reading the carefully and it costs people nothing. There are virtually no repercussions if I reblog a scam post so long as I don't give any of my own money and other suckers do.

Re: Inspired by the not-fandom failbarred secret - internet panhandling

[(Anonymous)]

There was a recent donation post about a trans girl who got outted that was taken basically word for word from a legitimate one a year or two back. The fake one got thousands of retweets. People don't fact check.

Re: Inspired by the not-fandom failbarred secret - internet panhandling

[(Anonymous)]

Exactly. People do pull (and are successful up to a point) crazier, more elaborate scams, faking cancer and stuff like that. A tumblr sob story doesn't even require that much effort if you can hit the right notes. I didn't want to be harsh to the anon I originally responded to, but the idea that reblogs are all done by "friends who trust you" is... um... a little naive. It's mostly social media friendships, meaning people who sorta kinda know you, but not really. A reblog is not an endorsement of fact-checking or trust. It's just not.