[ SECRET POST #4279 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4279 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________
























02. [SPOILERS for Killing Ground]



__________________________________________________


03. [SPOILERS for In Bruges]



__________________________________________________



04. [SPOILERS for The Babysitter]



__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for Great British Menu series 7]

[Great British Menu series 7, Alan Murchison]


__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for discussion of non-con]

























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #612.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I feel like if we held the writers of canon to higher account (most of whom are white dudes, still) then this trend would lessen.

A ton of shows/books/movies still glorify the relationships between men (whether they're friendships or antagonistic) and insert women as tokenistic love interests who do the 'Go defeat the baddie, I'll be waiting in bed!' thing; or else are the mean shrew trope; and instead of recognising that we need more diversity from producers themselves, there's this obsession over what's the correct reaction to have to their same-y output (e.g. the endless arguments about fic representation - 'writing m/m is fetishistic', 'writing f/f is just to block your favourite m/m pair', or god forbid, the race aspect.)

When you get arguments over sexist fanfic writers when the text source is like, a MCU film or Supernatural or whatever; it seems like you're letting the canon itself off pretty easily.