[ SECRET POST #4282 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4282 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Colette]


__________________________________________________


03.
[Sara Sidle on CSI]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Criminal Minds]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Step by Step, Cody/Dana]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Buffy the Vampire Slayer]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Mad Men]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #613.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

You can't push assumptions onto history either way.

I totally agree. You can't make assumptions either way. That's just as true for asserting that everyone in history was cis. We don't know, and can't know, the specific identity of any historical person. But the balance of probability is that some of them were what we today would call trans. So what's the use of dismissing the possibility?

[digitalghosts]

I add to this: some people actually did state they were whichever gender they preferred while labled the other but used different language. Some were queer folks trying to pass under radar as well and quite few did also say it themselves (if I recall the character whom Brandon Tena is based on identified as a lesbian and not a bloke so it does happen in various ways). We really have no way of knowing for sure unless we ask person in question.