[ SECRET POST #4290 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4290 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #614.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Both of those things are true.

I think we're talking more about the times when she retroactively canonicizes diversity, like with Dumbledore and now Nagini.

[tree_and_leaf]

I still think that, even though Dumbledore's sexuality isn't explicit in the novels, we're meant to read Rita's comments about his relationships with Grindelwald and with Doge as insinuating that Dumbledore is gay, because that is exactly how tabloid journalists used to talk about closeted gay men in the 80s and 90s when they weren't one hundred per cent sure they would win a libel suit. And, of course, we discover that virtually everything Rita says in her biography is based on truth, albeit spun to look as bad as possible.

So Dumbledore is an odd one for me. It's not quite strong enough to count as full canonical representation, but on the other hand it seems to emerge quite organically from canon and didn't feel pasted on or like it came out of left field (which the Nagini thing does).