case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-10-02 06:28 pm

[ SECRET POST #4290 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4290 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #614.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
tree_and_leaf: Watercolour of barn owl perched on post. (Default)

[personal profile] tree_and_leaf 2018-10-03 10:53 am (UTC)(link)
it's not direct coding

Disagree - sort of. The way Rita writes about him in "The Life and Lies" is pretty much exactly how British tabloid journalists in the eighties and nineties signalled "this bloke is a [insert homophobic slur of choice] but we haven't got a smoking gun and we're worried we might not win a libel case so we're not going to out him, but take our word for it, he's definitely one of them"

(Anonymous) 2018-10-03 05:43 pm (UTC)(link)
I hope you'll forgive me if I say that I still think that's fairly indirect signaling. Especially given how unsympathetic Rita is, and the fact that it s just her hinting and dissembling.

to be clear, I'm not saying that Dumbledore being gay was surprising. I just don't think you could conclude it, or come close to concluding, on the basis of the book itself. The most you could do was wonder.