[ SECRET POST #4293 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4293 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________














05. [SPOILERS for Castle Rock]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Deadpool 2]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of rape/assault]

[Buffy the Vampire Slayer]










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #614.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Part of being a writer includes communicating clearly what you want for the reader to understand. If you have to use media coverage of public appearances to clarify what you really meant, you probably failed in writing that work.

Especially when some of the people confused are your own scriptwriters who are doing a deep read of your work.

There are fucktons of "confirmed bachelors" in the English literary and cinematic canon, few of them are worthy to be considered part of the LGBTQ canon as well.

[(Anonymous)]

Also, there's at least one character in HP who can easily be read as having gay subtext but is canonically confirmed to be straight (Lupin)

so saying that the subtext is inarguable seems a little much

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT: Potter is pretty good fiction. But it's not good LGBT fiction, even for its time period and reading level. I don't get why this is the hill Potter fans seem so eager to die on.