[ SECRET POST #4293 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4293 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________














05. [SPOILERS for Castle Rock]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Deadpool 2]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of rape/assault]

[Buffy the Vampire Slayer]










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #614.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

This. Rowling could've done whatever she liked, given the success of that series. Her publishers would've been idiots to refuse her and they certainly wouldn't have been able to bar her from writing LBGQT characters. Because, you know, she could just take those characters and that extremely profitable likely bestselling book to a publisher who WOULD be okay with it. The very idea of Rowling being censored by her publishing company is preposterous. I assume it's coming from someone who knows very little about how the industry works.

[(Anonymous)]

And you know what? The books would be fine if fans stopped wanking about how Dumbledore was important LGBTQ for its genre and grade level.

Yates's earlier comments that screenwriters don't need to deal with it because everyone already knows are pure shit though.