[ SECRET POST #4293 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4293 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________














05. [SPOILERS for Castle Rock]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Deadpool 2]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of rape/assault]

[Buffy the Vampire Slayer]










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #614.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Please look upthread for the comments about how Scholastic is one publishing company out of many, and about challenging it'd be to exercise creative control over a bestselling, wealthy author of the world's most popular ongoing series. And if, as you seem to imply, "Jo" was so on fire about supporting just causes and using them in her work, stopping her from writing gay characters would've been impossible for her publishing company.

Mind you, I don't think she's a bad person for not including more diversity or LBGQT characters in Harry Potter. I don't even think it's a huge moral failing in her work or her personal life. But this excuse of "... but Scholaaaaastic!" is a very, very flimsy one.