[ SECRET POST #4295 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4295 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 41 secrets from Secret Submission Post #615.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Unpopular opinions

[(Anonymous)]

If you're in a job that produces something for which there is constant demand, even if it's just sales reports or whatever, and maybe for some service jobs, but I feel that there are a lot of jobs where this not only wouldn't work but would actually result in less pay for people who are already low-paid. For example, if waitstaff are already essentially working for tips, would getting paid for productivity mean *only* working for tips, or only getting paid based on the number of customers they serve? What if you get assigned a slow shift? You have to stand around for the whole shift and barely make any money because you weren't being "productive."