[ SECRET POST #4298 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4298 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 13 secrets from Secret Submission Post #615.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I think most of Anastasia's inaccuracies fall into one of two categories: either the unrealistic cartoonism and magic and musical-style singing, or the idea that the central character actually was Anastasia as claimed and not a pretender.

Whereas Pocahontas' whole setup and narrative is just... nonsense

[(Anonymous)]

Well, to be fair, the unrealistic cartoonism and magic made a right royal muck-up of the depiction of the Russian revolution. So there was that. Ignoring everything about the actual revolution and its causes in favour of 'undead sorceror casts a curse and the palace falls in a night' is a bit nonsense as well.

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, I think it's generally hard to tease out the difference between historical inaccuracy and genre convention

[(Anonymous)]

Given what we do know about what actually happened to the royal family, I'd put it at a liiittle closer to Pocahontas nonsense than you seem to.

[(Anonymous)]

The fact that all of them died? That's what I was referring to with the fact that Anastasia was a pretender rather than actually Anastasia. And even then, there actually were such pretenders (at least IIRC).