[ SECRET POST #4300 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4300 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________




















07. [SPOILERS for Iron Fist season 2]




__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for discussion of sexual assault]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #615.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Monsterfucking

[(Anonymous)]

Are you for it or against it? Why or why not?

Re: Monsterfucking

[kaijinscendre]

Let people fuck whatever monsters they want. It is all fictional anyways.

Re: Monsterfucking

[(Anonymous)]

Hey, your kink is not my kink. You do you, boo. Just please leave me out of it, kthnxbai.

Re: Monsterfucking

[(Anonymous)]

If we’re talking human/monster fucking, so long as the monster isn’t so much more or less intelligent than the human that it’s like a human fucking a dog, and both the human and the monster are into it, I wouldn’t care.

Re: Monsterfucking

[(Anonymous)]

I'm all for it. Most of my fictional crushes are some form of non-human.

Re: Monsterfucking

[(Anonymous)]

For me, it depends on the monster. I'd want them to be vaguely humanoid and with adult intelligence.

Re: Monsterfucking

[(Anonymous)]

yes pls more pls give me all the monsterfucking

Re: Monsterfucking

[(Anonymous)]

Definitely not against it. I mean I don't think it gets more fictional/imaginary than monsterfucking, so I don't understand why one would take issue with it morally or whatever.

That said, not all of it turns me on. I'm really into mythical creatures - satyrs, centaurs, minotaurs, etc. And anything huge. Size kink definitely goes along with the monster kink for me. Not really into stuff like tentacle porn, though I can appreciate the appeal it has to others.

Re: Monsterfucking

[tabaqui]

For it, but only certain monsters. I have no interest in like, ghouls or zombie fucking, ew. But some of the classic Greek/Roman monsters, or werewolves, or vampires, or merpeople, or things with tentacles.... :D

Re: Monsterfucking

[(Anonymous)]

For. I mean, it's not my kink, but it's purely fictional, so anyone pearl-clutching over porn written about entirely fictional creatures that do not exist in any form on our planet are being a special kind of stupid above and beyond normal kinkshaming.

Depends

[(Anonymous)]

On the monster and the fucking. I sometimes get a little skeeved if I think too long in the abstract about the age and experiential differences between some vampires and mortals. I don't really know why. But then I remind myself realism and sex with vampires doesn't actually go together at all. And also, almost every vampire I've read about or watched has been really immature, so eh. Tentacle monsters definitely have their place. Werewolves can be interesting. Not at all interested in insect-like or arachnid-like monster fucking, except in a vague sort of body horror sense.

Re: Monsterfucking

[(Anonymous)]

I dig it quite a bit, but only if:

-The monster is humanoid.
-The monster is sapient.
-Both parties are into it.
-The human and the monster actually know each other and have a relationship beyond just fucking.

If those criteria are not met, then it's not my scene.

Re: Monsterfucking

[(Anonymous)]

If people want to fuck monsters, let them fuck monsters. Just keep me out of it.