case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-11-03 04:06 pm

[ SECRET POST #4322 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4322 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 37 secrets from Secret Submission Post #619.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2018-11-04 01:56 am (UTC)(link)
"I see no reason to limit this criticism to these 2 men" implies that this is what you believe OP is doing. You're not giving people quite enough credit for reading what you actually wrote.

(Anonymous) 2018-11-04 02:06 am (UTC)(link)
No, you interpreted it as reflecting my opinions or beliefs about the OP's mindset instead of a general observation. You are arguing there's only one obvious, literal way to read something (and something written online, a notoriously bad way to communicate). Rather than recognizing that people sometimes use particular turns of phrases in rhetorical ways, you immediately turned antagonistic and nitpicked (and continue to nitpick) an ultimately minor observation - one I'm not alone in making on this secret. I, for one, have better things to do, so I won't be replying to you any more.