case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-11-05 06:39 pm

[ SECRET POST #2324 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4324 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 25 secrets from Secret Submission Post #619.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2018-11-06 12:04 am (UTC)(link)
Even if you change the way that the character functions in future episodes, he's still affected by the ~20 years of episodes where his accent was a punchline, isn't he?

I mean I don't think it matters much either way because the earlier episodes are the ones that people actually watch so it's largely a symbolic gesture. But if people are justified in being offended at the way that the character was written, I don't see how the character can really be reclaimed at that point.

(Anonymous) 2018-11-06 03:45 am (UTC)(link)
"Even if you change the way that the character functions in future episodes, he's still affected by the ~20 years of episodes where his accent was a punchline, isn't he?"

Characters can develop and change over time, if the people writing them wish them to do so. I'm also not sure about the logic of this, because it almost sounds like you're implying there's no point in changing anything even if you have good reason to... and that's pretty silly. It does not apply to TV shows, which make plenty of changes all the time.