[ SECRET POST #4236 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4326 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 13 secrets from Secret Submission Post #619.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Media exists in order to sell you things. Therefore you cannot sexualize actors without objectifying them.

[(Anonymous)]

Yes, there's some truth to that - to the extent that capitalist economic relations intrinsically involve some degree of objectification / alienation.

But, first, sexual objectification and economic objectification are different things. Second, we all live in a society primarily governed by capitalist economic relations in most or all aspects of life. Objectification and alienation are inevitable outcomes of that system, things that we can't avoid. But we can still talk in terms of having more or less agency and choice within that system. And in the same way, there's still a meaningful distinction that you can draw between objectification and sexualization.