Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2018-11-08 04:47 pm
[ SECRET POST #4327 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4327 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Star Trek: The Next Generation, S02E10 "The Dauphin"]
__________________________________________________
04.

[The Haunting of Hill House]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Red Dead Redemption 2]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Jamie & Jimmy's Food Fight Club]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #619.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-11-11 02:35 pm (UTC)(link)Just that I find your statement petty as hell. Because I get where you're coming from- It's just when you say something like, 'it's an incredibly high bar to clear for me to be a fan of someone whose parents were already famous actors', I don't see much interpretation there. Not to mention, again, you assuming they must act so entitled as to believe they had absolutely no advantage in becoming what they are... Just the fact that you adjust your standards on what an actors parents do, rather than judge them for who they actually are astounds me.
You said, straight up, that you held other peoples good fortune against them. Be it actors, or not, that's pretty telling in and of itself.
But you do realize that actors aren't fictional, right? They're people, just like you and me. So, yes, there is a standard that says you shouldn't judge someone on
anything but their own self worth- it's called being a decent human being. If you don't judge some stranger on the street, why should you judge strangers on film any differently.