[ SECRET POST #4346 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4346 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 22 secrets from Secret Submission Post #622.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Tbh it seems like everyone I know is excited but I'm just...not. Yes, it looks nice. But even hearing James Earl Jones' voice at the beginning just made it more...why. Like, why is this necessary? What's wrong with the animated one exactly that it's good enough to copy shot by shot but has to be 'updated' with CGI? It just feels like another example of animation age ghetto, that somehow being live action (well, CG) makes it 'better' or more 'mature.' I don't necessarily think this one will actively suck the way that, say, the live action Beauty & the Beast did, it just feels like it's entirely unnecessary and has no reason to exist other than Disney trying to milk more dollars out of beloved properties.

+1

[(Anonymous)]

I'm with you, all the way. Unnecessary is exactly the word.

+2

[(Anonymous)]

same. i don't see what's so wrong with the 2D animation and why la/cgi is so much more "mature". i imagine they'll remove the songs that made the film entertaining for younger children as well.