[ SECRET POST #4349 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4349 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03. https://i.imgur.com/W9x9FD0.png
[Tenchi Forever! The Movie, OP warned for NSFW]

























04. [SPOILERS for Doctor S11E04 "Arachnids in the UK"]



__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for Daredevil season 3]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Daredevil season 3]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for incest]

[Gravity Falls]


__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for discussion of loli/shota and child porn]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #622.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[erinptah]

There's things I don't care for about the new style, but...I really don't get the number of people romanticizing the old one.

Especially now that Netflix has the old first season, and I've watched a few. It was stiff, the motion was awkward, most of the characters were the same action-figure mold with different hair swapped in -- and nobody in the new style looks as silly and cartoony as, say, original-version Madame Razz. I can understand loving it for nostalgia reasons (I've got the same thing with Thundercats), but objectively great it is not :/

[(Anonymous)]

I find the new style just as samey as the old one, honestly. It's just a different brand of same. We've moved from 80s Mattel to early 2000s fanart. It's cool that there's more variety in body shape now, though.

[erinptah]

The nonvariety in body shape (and face model) is mostly what I meant by "samey."

Unless you're talking about the style being hard to distinguish from other contemporary shows? Which, sure, you're not wrong, but imo that's not an inherently bad thing (it's just neutral) -- unlike same-mold character designs.

[philstar22]

Romanticizing old art styles in animation is nothing new. Look at all the people who think that hand drawn animation is inherently superior to computer generated animation. Even when the computer generated stuff is really good.

[(Anonymous)]

I personnaly find hand drawn animation more touching from an artistic point of view. While there're great computer generated stuff, it just doesn't make me want to admire it like I would a painting, it doesn't move me. But that doesn't mean than one is objectively better than the other, both should be able to coexist.

[philstar22]

And I have no problem with that. What bugs me are the people who insist hand drawn is objectively better and that computer generated is objectively terrible every single time.