[ SECRET POST #4349 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4349 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03. https://i.imgur.com/W9x9FD0.png
[Tenchi Forever! The Movie, OP warned for NSFW]

























04. [SPOILERS for Doctor S11E04 "Arachnids in the UK"]



__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for Daredevil season 3]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Daredevil season 3]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for incest]

[Gravity Falls]


__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for discussion of loli/shota and child porn]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #622.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Okay, I see your point. But if someone drew a picture of a person being ripped in half, would that be the same as a photo of a person in the process of being ripped in half? I'm honestly just wondering.

[(Anonymous)]

If otakus advocated people-getting-ripped-in-half porn, and a good chunk of anime culture involves dealing with the people constantly defending the sexualization of people getting ripped in half, and having the whole anime industry bend towards shoving people getting ripped in half for the fucking nerds who refuse to consume media that doesn't hint at people getting ripped in half at least every twenty seconds, maybe I'll treat this argument well.

My point is that lolicon and shotacon does involve sexualization of kids by a lot of people who are motivated by reasons not involving coping for past trauma, and instead for other reasons (hint: it's the peepee), which I think does put it in the same vein as CP. In kink places, there's always the separation of fantasy from reality and a great understanding of mutual consent, but doesn't apply when the fantasy at hand is diddling kids.

So I'll say that shota/loli and cp are two leaves on the same branch, but shota/loli is highly insidious in how culturally accepted it is, and how much it is catered to.

[(Anonymous)]

n kink places, there's always the separation of fantasy from reality and a great understanding of mutual consent, but doesn't apply when the fantasy at hand is diddling kids.

Why not? What is it about kids specifically that is somehow the one fantasy that can't be indulged in a strict-separation-of-fantasy-from-reality context? There are lots of highly taboo, dangerous, and illegal things that people roleplay in kink scenes and depict in art up to and including torture and murder, and the practitioners understand full well that it's only okay because it isn't real. What is unique about fantasies involving kids in this respect?

[(Anonymous)]

shut the fuck up pedo

[(Anonymous)]

LOL, I have no interest in kids at all. Loli and shota are completely boring and unappealing to me. It's not a fantasy I have. That's why I don't get why it's so different from all these other fantasies I also don't have.