[ SECRET POST #4356 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4356 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.



__________________________________________________



12.
[Babylon 5 (episode Comes the Inquisitor)]


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________















14. [SPOILERS for The Letter]



__________________________________________________



15 [WARNING for discussion of suicide]

[2004 adaptation of Elizabeth Gaskell's North & South]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #623.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Who Should Host The Oscars?

[(Anonymous)]

Oh I'm sorry, I mistook you for someone capable of having an intelligent exchange, I didn't realise I was dealing with someone who ignores facts and twists things to fit their agenda. You do you and I'm out.

Re: Who Should Host The Oscars?

[(Anonymous)]

If you'd like to tell me how I'm wrong, I'm happy to listen

Re: Who Should Host The Oscars?

[(Anonymous)]

Psssssssttt. If you want people to respect your facts and figures, you need to cite them first. People who are capable of having an intelligent exchange generally aren't fooled into thinking that a vague mention of the existence of proof = hard facts.