case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-12-08 02:16 pm

[ SECRET POST #4357 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4357 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 46 secrets from Secret Submission Post #624.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2018-12-08 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)
This is extending way too much credit towards Tumblr

(Anonymous) 2018-12-09 05:25 am (UTC)(link)
DA

No it's not. Tumblr is relying on inaccurate bots. And one of the things they seem to look at is number of reports. So if something was reported by antis many times for being pedophilic, it is likely to be banned even if it wasn't. (Someone tested this on a fake blog and managed to get several completely innocent posts banned by reporting them several times, even from the same few ips.)