case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-12-15 04:26 pm

[ SECRET POST #4354 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4364 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 48 secrets from Secret Submission Post #625.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
type_wild: (Tea - Masako)

[personal profile] type_wild 2018-12-15 10:35 pm (UTC)(link)
I use Goodreads if I want the user review aggregate, and I never read book bloggers, but reviewers for professional publications like newspapers, magazines, larger websites for genre fiction etc.

I also tend to find that hits and kudos only serve to part the mediocre fic from the bad ones, because there's so much more than quality determining what people like. Does it have the most popular fanon? Is the author a BNF? How many chapters is it? Is it smut?Is it whatever AU is the hot thing this season? The biggest fandom hits tend to be passable, while the true gems get way less attention than your run-of-the-mill hanahaki-disease dribble.

(Anonymous) 2018-12-15 10:51 pm (UTC)(link)
IA that kudos mostly serve to separate the bad fic from everything else, but that's still useful.

And IMO published fiction is also very, very vulnerable to popularity and trends and random flavor-of-the-month stuff and peer pressure. Both for writers and reviewers.