[ SECRET POST #4369 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4369 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 10 secrets from Secret Submission Post #625.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Subthread OP

[(Anonymous)]

I think you just nailed why I hate it. It's because it's hardly ever used in cases where the person's position actually is so obvious that having to state it is laughable. Take my example about white privilege. That's still a thing lots of people do need explained to them. You can't expect the average person to be woke enough to automatically know about it and its ties to racism. So using "lmao" to mock things like that is a bit like if a calculus professor described an equation to students having trouble understanding it and unironically ended with "I mean, duh." It's gaslighting people on their level of intelligence (or woke points)

Re: Subthread OP

[(Anonymous)]

It really depends on the context for me. There are times when I think it's appropriate.

Re: Subthread OP

[(Anonymous)]

DA

I always thought it had to do with the person feeling awkward about having to explain something that by their (possible) standards, should be common knowledge...
Like they weren't sure if what they were responding to was a (very bad) joke or not?