[ SECRET POST #4383 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4383 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Queer Eye, "Dega Don't"]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Dynamo aka Steven Frayne (magician)]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Trillion: God of Destruction]


__________________________________________________



07.




__________________________________________________











08. [SPOILERS for Tidelands season 1 finale]




__________________________________________________












09. [WARNING for discussion of rape]
https://i.imgur.com/rJDntrN.png
[Goblin Slayer anime, linked for rape]
























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #627.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[sparklywalls]

I have a thing where I read the book only a couple of years ago and...really didn't enjoy it as much as the film. So I can sort of relate on some level albeit not the exact same one. I KNOW it wasn't a direct adaption as well but there's enough similarities in it where your brain can't help but compare.

You like what you like OP and you gave it a couple of chances but you don't like Blade Runner. That's fine.

[tabaqui]

The book is so *extremely* strange. I enjoyed both, but - wow. It always baffles me how they got that movie from that book.
(I do wish they'd had Deckard's sheep in the movie, though....)

[sparklywalls]

Oh yes agree re: the sheep. I did like in the book that the relationship between owning a real animal and social status was a bit more blatant but I guess Deckard pausing to flick through a catalogue doesn't make for exciting viewing!

The collective vision/hallucination experience in the book is definitely VERY weird. I can understand why they ditched that.

[tabaqui]

OH yes, extremely weird.

I just wish they'd made it more clear about animals, and why the owl and snake were a bit deal, and why Deckard asked if they were real.... Oh well. :D