[ SECRET POST #4386 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4386 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 33 secrets from Secret Submission Post #628.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I can't think of any examples off-hand, but I feel like usually in fiction, it's portrayed as being much more about whether it was right or wrong, not just a purely emotional reaction.

[(Anonymous)]

People do that in real life, too, though. They confuse the emotional upset of killing with morality because 'if they feel horrible about it, it must be that they were wrong, right?' Even when they turn around and agree in a strictly factual sense there wasn't anything they could do. Emotions are weird like that.

So I wouldn't say it's unrealistic to portray that way. Usually the shows also have people arguing the logical side to make them stop angsting too.

[(Anonymous)]

This.