[ SECRET POST #4399 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4399 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Cassandra Clare & her books: TMI/TID/TDA]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Doctor Who]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Canadian ice dancers Tessa Virtue and Scott Moir]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Charmed]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Criminal Minds - season 4, episode 8 "Masterpiece"]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Tidying Up with Marie Kondo]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #630.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: And the sibling pairs?

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt

I've actually written sibling RPS and don't really care if anyone is fantasizing whatever, but in this particular case, the specific wording of the secret "it's just hard to imagine... without also being in love with them" is what I have an issue with, I guess. To me, it sounds a little tinhat-ish when applied to any real people, but especially when applied to family members.

Re: And the sibling pairs?

[(Anonymous)]

Read it that way if you want, but I'm the OP and I've never believed for a second that they're actually together. I said I find it hard to imagine being that intimate with a person in ways A, B, and C and not being intimate with them, and that's true. I do find that hard to imagine, for myself, personally. But nowhere in my secret do I suggest that my own feelings dictate their reality. And frankly, I'm baffled that anyone would jump to that conclusion based on what I said.

I said what I meant. I wasn't implying anything more than exactly what's there.