case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-01-23 05:08 pm

[ SECRET POST #4402 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4402 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 17 secrets from Secret Submission Post #630.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2019-01-24 04:02 am (UTC)(link)
There is a difference between disagreeing and missing the point, yes. But when a comment merely restates the definition of RPF instead of addressing the OP's point that the portrayal in RPF are heavily influenced by the characters and therefore the "real" part is is not real, then the comment is doing the latter, not the former.