Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2019-01-27 02:43 pm
[ SECRET POST #4406 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4406 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 47 secrets from Secret Submission Post #631.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-01-27 07:59 pm (UTC)(link)Historical accuracy in a movie is only really an issue for me anyways if someone is drawing really stupid conclusions based on historical inaccuracy. As long as the story's good...
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-01-27 08:44 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-01-27 08:45 pm (UTC)(link)As long as the people who made the movie don't go around telling me how accurate their movie is, I honestly don't really mind inaccuracies (There are exceptions like something eyerollingly dumb) in movies. I'm here for the pretty costumes and to see my historical favs.
no subject
And yes the costumes and the sets were beautiful. I also enjoyed that it was three very strong female leads, but especially Olivia Colman who was brilliant as always. I did enjoy Nicholas Hoult's turn too but this film definitely belonged to the ladies.
I say all this but it's a different story when something is promoted as accurate/true and demonstrably...isn't.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-01-27 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)I too was annoyed by the Mary Queen of Scots movie
(real talk tho there will always be morons who just assume everything they see on a screen is 100% completely accurate and will go around telling people "that's how it really happened!" but tbh it bothers me less when it's something as easily proven inaccurate as certain parts of The Favorite)
no subject
And then you've got stuff like Braveheart. Ok, it's...not good. But we know so little about the real William Wallace that it gets a *sort of* pass from the point of view that it largely draws from a source written a couple of centuries after Wallace's death and that source is probably mostly made up anyway. It's all about how the story makes you feel though, it was meant to invoke anger and passion. However, there's a part of me that wishes that almost anyone other than fucking Mel Gibson was associated with that role.
Also I totally get the rage regarding the blue face paint and plaid because both those were simply not things at the time of Wallace and even pre-Google you could find this out easily!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-01-28 01:44 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-01-27 09:21 pm (UTC)(link)1. How far in the past is something based?
2. How hard do the creators/advertisers push the "trufax" angle?
3. Does the style and tone of the movie actively divorce it from reality?
4. Is it a story about someone who was mostly powerful, or someone who was subjugated?
The inaccuracies really bothered me in something like The Imitation Game, for example. But in something like The Favorite, I'm perfectly happy to watch a movie that's extremely loosely inspired by reality.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-01-28 03:31 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-01-27 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-01-28 01:00 am (UTC)(link)I really want to watch this now!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-01-29 04:14 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-01-28 01:43 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-01-28 03:20 am (UTC)(link)