[ SECRET POST #4409 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4409 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 19 secrets from Secret Submission Post #631.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - empty comment ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Non-fandom secrets/unpopular opinions

[(Anonymous)]

So I think what I mean by 'essentialist' is: when we talk about sex, is it just an assortment of scientific facts about the world - that is to say, the specific sexual organs that people have are just some sex organs that they happen to have, the hormones that they have are chemicals that affect brains in certain quantifiable ways, and there's considerable variance within each category?

or on the other hand, is there some kind of intrinsic moral valence to that definition, some essential underlying meaning, that dictates some kind of fundamental truth about what it is to be human?

Re: Non-fandom secrets/unpopular opinions

[philstar22]

Oh, okay, then no.