[ SECRET POST #4411 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4411 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



















08. [SPOILERS for Crazy Ex Girlfriend]



__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for You]
[WARNING for stalking]



__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for discussion of sexual harassment]



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #631.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Critical Research Failure

[(Anonymous)]

Does every failed and inaccurate attempt to call back on Star Trek's original series count?
Because, if so, that.

Even when the creators actually have watched the series, (discovery, unlike the 09' movie 'AU's where he actively admitted to never have watched/liked the series), Their attempt to 'include' aspects of the original series just makes everything worse...

Re: Critical Research Failure

[(Anonymous)]

AMEN