[ SECRET POST #4416 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4416 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 18 secrets from Secret Submission Post #632.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

That's... still not pedophilia, because they're not a child.

[(Anonymous)]

Then why would a 1000 year old loli be?

[(Anonymous)]

That seems like an utterly useless point of view. If a fictional child is depicted as a child for every meaningful purpose - especially around being sexualized - then I think that's something that we can recognize, not something we have to ignore because of a transparent justification.