[ SECRET POST #4417 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4417 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 10 secrets from Secret Submission Post #632.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Secrets you're too lazy to make

[(Anonymous)]

What the fuck, lol. Did you not read my original post? The line for me is the fact that there's no evidence he assaulted/raped anyone. I responded to your claim that since everyone hates Vic the studios firing him is a business decision. jesus wtf anon

Re: Secrets you're too lazy to make

[(Anonymous)]

You said "no undeniable evidence". There's no such thing as undeniable evidence.

Re: Secrets you're too lazy to make

[(Anonymous)]

My god. What are you even trying to argue? No one has even claimed Vic raped them.

Re: Secrets you're too lazy to make

[(Anonymous)]

You're smart enough to figure out what it means in this context, I hope.

Re: Secrets you're too lazy to make

[(Anonymous)]

Honestly, I do think it's an important point, because I'm sure Bill Cosby would deny and does deny against the evidence against him. "Undeniable evidence" is a bad standard to use for that reason.

Re: Secrets you're too lazy to make

[(Anonymous)]

If there wasn't evidence, he wouldn't be in jail you dolt.

Re: Secrets you're too lazy to make

[(Anonymous)]

"undeniable" evidence

Re: Secrets you're too lazy to make

[(Anonymous)]

"undeniable" evidence does not mean that the person being accused can't deny it. You understand that, correct? It means indisputable for a jury.

Re: Secrets you're too lazy to make

[(Anonymous)]

You and I are not on a jury, and no one involved in this conversation is on a jury, so where does a jury's opinion enter the equation in the first place?