case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-02-14 07:38 pm

[ SECRET POST #4424 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4424 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 11 secrets from Secret Submission Post #633.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2019-02-15 01:20 am (UTC)(link)
That it's an imperative on the species level does not mean that it's an imperative on the individual level, which is what we're talking about here.

(Anonymous) 2019-02-15 02:22 am (UTC)(link)
Secret op did not say it’s imperative on the individual level, just that it was a biological imperative and that is why people do change their minds m.

(Anonymous) 2019-02-15 03:36 am (UTC)(link)
I get the point you're making about the evolutionary instincts and shit (although I would be more reserved about how strong the connection is between evolutionary incentive & individual human choices even then).

But I don't think there's any point where it's correct to talk about it as a biological imperative on the individual level - which is the way that OP was talking about it. Because, one, it's factually incorrect, and two, it also makes it seem... uh... I mean, it seems to me that, once you talk about it being an imperative on the individual level, you're going to have a hard time avoiding the conclusion that someone not fulfilling that imperative is dysfunctional in some sense.

(Anonymous) 2019-02-15 03:42 am (UTC)(link)
NA

I do feel out is kinda a biological imperative on an individual level, though. I do not intend to have kids. But, at 40, I can very much feel a "biological clock" telling me I really need to have a baby. I'm a person, so I'm more than my biology and can tell my biological clock to shut the fuck up, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

(Anonymous) 2019-02-15 03:56 am (UTC)(link)
Even at that, I don't think "imperative" would be a correct word to use

(Anonymous) 2019-02-15 04:39 am (UTC)(link)
That's not a biological imperative. It's a social imperative. Women are expected to have children so when you start to hit a certain age and you haven't had kids yet, you think you have some bio clock that you can sense but it's really just internalized social pressure.

(Anonymous) 2019-02-15 05:34 am (UTC)(link)
Not really? Do you think having kids is only a social drive? There is a biological urge many but not all people (not just women) have to reproduce. I can see disliking the phrasing of imperative but acting like the urge to have children is just social pressure is patently false.

(Anonymous) 2019-02-15 05:37 am (UTC)(link)
DA

Eh I'd go with 'impulse' or something. Some people have it, some people don't at all, for some people it's overwhelming, for others it's there but ignorable

(Anonymous) 2019-02-15 05:40 am (UTC)(link)
You having it doesn't mean others have it tho.