[ SECRET POST #4445 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4445 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Project Runway]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Glee]


__________________________________________________



04.
[James Bond: Die Another Day]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Project Runway]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
[Princess Bride]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 10 secrets from Secret Submission Post #636.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I'd never dare to make changes, because the risk of making things even worse would be too great. Stop Hitler, Stalin or Pol Pot before they come to power? Fine, now they are replaced by someone less insane and a lot more efficient.

[feotakahari]

Any interpretation of history that presents the Holocaust as the best possible outcome is antisemitic, if not by intention, then in practice.

[(Anonymous)]

What-iffery is usually not very useful or interesting as a guide to moral consideration. And that kinda goes both ways - I don't think imagining a universe where, for instance, there's no Holocaust but there is a total nuclear war leading to the extinction of the human race is anti-semitic. It's a pure hypothetical.

[(Anonymous)]

A Holocaust that left survivors is still miles better than a Holocaust with no survivors.

[(Anonymous)]

Nah. Something like that was going to happen eventually. If not towards Jewish people than towards some other minority group. At least this happened before nuclear weapons and the internet existed.

[(Anonymous)]

the Armenian genocide happened before the Holocaust, and there's been genocides (or attempted genocides) since. What made the Holocaust distinctive was the scope and scale of the killing, the organization, and the methodical thought that went into it.

[(Anonymous)]

Their point was that one left survivors, whereas a worse one wouldn't have. Which is grim, but it's very much a case of "at least there was someone who lived through it."

[(Anonymous)]

"Something even worse could happen" doesn't equal "this is the best possible outcome" though.