Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2019-03-08 05:24 pm
[ SECRET POST #4446 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4446 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07. [SPOILERS for The Umbrella Academy]

__________________________________________________
08. [SPOILERS for The Umbrella Academy]

__________________________________________________
09. [SPOILERS for The Promised Neverland]

__________________________________________________
10. [SPOILERS for The Umbrella Academy]
[WARNING for character death]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #636.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-03-09 03:37 am (UTC)(link)"I didn’t see any problem with Belle being feminist or shamed for reading, since those both are tenets of the 1991 film."
Ehh... I mean, yes, sort of. But in the cartoon, the villagers don't view Belle's reading with outright hostility, they just think it an odd habit. In the live action version exaggerates it quite a bit with Belle getting bullied by the other villagers for daring to try and teach a little girl to read.
I don't have an issue with Belle being feminist; I just think the live action version didn't handle that well. Ditto her being an inventor - it's a neat idea, but a token one. Do we ever see it in action? Does it play a significant role at all?
IA that Belle's gown was hideous. It looked cheap, like a costume version you'd buy at Walmart. The fuss about the corset seemed more a reaction to the Cinderella film than any sort of concrete statement about feminism in general.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-03-09 04:16 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-03-09 04:41 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-03-09 05:34 am (UTC)(link)I remember being frustrated with the live action Cinderella because having raised a question the animated one never outright does—why does Cinderella not just leave her abusive “family” behind—her answer is that she can’t bring herself to leave the place her father/parents loved so much.
It felt... fake, like she should’ve been hiding another, less twee reason—depressed misery, anger, stubborness—behind that answer and the film was so committed to her being sweetness and light that there wasn’t room. Likewise Lady Tremaine’s outburst about why she hates Cinderella felt like shorthand, but it’s still way darker than anything said in the animated version.
And while Maleficent was a reimagining of Sleeping Beauty, both the very thinly veiled rape-metaphor of Maleficent herself, and the fact that Aurora’s mother dies and her father is a conniving madman are way darker than Disney’s animated version gets.
I would be very surprised if any of the new live action (for a given value of live, cough cough Lion King cough) movies end up lighter in tone or even as light as the Disney originals.
I don’t necessarily think Disney’s done a good job of inserting darker moments into their remakes, but Beauty and the Beast isn’t the only one it’s happened to.