case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-03-09 04:20 pm

[ SECRET POST #4447 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4447 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Leon S. Kennedy from Resident Evil games]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Big Family Cooking Showdown]


__________________________________________________



04.
[C. B. Cebulski]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Vikings]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Misfits (Season 2)]


__________________________________________________



07.
[The Umbrella Academy]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Splatoon 2]








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 46 secrets from Secret Submission Post #637.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2019-03-09 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)
But you just said it's not a clear-cut answer. That's the issue; they're fictional characters and drawings.

Yeah, you have things out there like lolicon and shotacon that are very clear-cut, but more of the discourse I've seen within my own fandoms are along the lines of 'drawing anything erotic involving any of the BNHA characters makes you a pedo.' These are characters who are in highschool for crying out loud and these people act like anyone who finds those characters attractive are looking to creep on actual teenagers.

(Anonymous) 2019-03-09 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I'm sure there are a lot of people in the discourse saying super dumb stuff about where the line should be drawn. But I don't agree that being attracted to fictional characters is never pedophilic, which is the argument that was being made.