[ SECRET POST #4452 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4452 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 10 secrets from Secret Submission Post #637.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: op

[(Anonymous)]

Daily reminder that there is still no scientific evidence for brain “genders”:

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2019/feb/24/meet-the-neuroscientist-shattering-the-myth-of-the-gendered-brain-gina-rippon

Re: op

[(Anonymous)]

not sure what that has to do with your transphobia, but you do you.

Re: op

[(Anonymous)]

Not believing in something imaginary (gender) is not transphobia. Believing in science is not transphobia. Disliking men trying to do screechy impressions of women is not transphobia, it’s offensive to women.

Tired of “transphobia” being used as a way to try to shut down anyone who doesn’t agree with trans fairytales.

Re: op

[(Anonymous)]

A radfem? At this time of year? At this time of day? In this part of the internet? Localized entirely within this forum?

Re: op

[(Anonymous)]

Hate to break it to you but most people don’t believe this, not only radfems. Go outside your bubble sometime.

different anon

[(Anonymous)]

okay, transphobe troll

Re: different anon

[(Anonymous)]

Lol, no comeback for science I see.

DA

[(Anonymous)]

Dude, there aren't even two sexes let alone two genders.

Also, science routinely disagrees with you because, again, see the aforementioned "not even two sexes." Intersex people are a lot more common than you think, just not in the straight up ~hermaphroditic~ sense.

Re: DA

[(Anonymous)]

Intersex is literally between sexes. Are you that dumb?

Also, intersex people have repeatedly said they don’t want to used as trans justification.

Re: DA

[(Anonymous)]

My wife is intersex and so is a friend of mine and they make this same argument, so go off.

Re: DA

[(Anonymous)]

Always someone’s “friend” in these arguments...

Re: DA

[(Anonymous)]

Wrong. Mammals are sexually dimorphic. Intersex means a variety of mutations of the two sexes, not a regular occurrence that would count as a seperate sexes.

Re: DA

[(Anonymous)]

That's because a lot of people don't want to admit that sexes aren't as black and white as they seem because a lot of people use it to justify all kinds of sexism, transphobia and homophobia.

Re: DA

[(Anonymous)]

No. Mammals are sexually dimorphic. There are variations, but it stll comes down to male and female. Intersexuality is collective term for a variation of mutations, not a seperate sex.

Re: op

[(Anonymous)]

i don't know why but this cracked me tf up